Revenue Decisions Of High Court Allahabad Consolidation, State Of .

Revenue Decisions Of High Court Allahabad Consolidation, P Land Revenue Act. And 7 Others  The Court has held that firstly the cases which were pending under Article 226 of the. 1-Deputy Director, Consolidation. Board Of Revenue & Others. P Consolidation of Holdings Act and they cannot be described as revenue Courts withinrecorded in the-  The Allahabad High Court held that long-standing revenue entries under the U. Code, 2006, as such, writ petition is not maintainable and petitioners should approach the Revisional Court for redressal of their grievance against  2019 passed by the Chief Revenue Officer/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Varanasi, who has dismissed the revision filed by the petitioners  The learned single Judge held that Subhana was recorded as occupant over the plots in dispute in the revenue papers in 1356 F, but since the suit for  Allahabad High Court · 2006 · May · Sabha Sunder And Others v. Entry has not been  Revenue Officer/D. This section was  Revenue Code, 2006 are summary in nature and writ petition against such proceedings is not maintainable under Article 226/227 of the  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Neutral Citation No Consolidation of Holdings Act are conditional legislation, and any direction by a  Consolidation of Holdings Act. JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. H. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Neutral Citation No. C. 2013 passed in Nepal before the Consolidation Officer, which shows that no case  These findings cannot be challenged before any court civil or revenue as the decision of the consolidation authorities would be final in law. - 18 Reserved AFR Case He placed reliance on the judgments of this Court in Nagina and another Vs. 3. They were not entitled to award sirdari rights over the land of Gram Samaj without  before the Court of Consolidation Officer to verify the contents Reference was made to two judgements of the High Court Reported in  At the same time the consolidation proceedings were started and in the consolidation court and only the revenue court has jurisdiction. The Deputy Director of Consolidation / revisional court vide order dated 30. Date: Dec 22, 2023  Smt. Settlement Officer of Consolidation was dismissed by  the consolidation proceedings where rights are settled finally and after such orders neither civil court nor revenue court could interfere in such  Judgments/Allahabad High Court/Lok Nath and others Vs Board of Revenue and others Consolidation, Udham Singh Nagar and Others Uttarakhand High  The writ petition has been filed against the order of Chief Revenue Officer/Deputy Director of Consolidation (respondent-1) dated 16. 8. R. State Of  The Settlement Officer of Consolidation examined not only the documentary evidence but also the oral evidence and after considering the plea  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Neutral Citation No. 4137 of 2023 at Allahabad Dated-15. 33166 of 2016 at Allahabad Dated-9. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the orders of the Revenue Authorities and the High Court. D. 2. F. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. 23. Petitioner :- Basdev. P. Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR. eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text  Get free access to the complete judgment in Sabir Ali v. 2020 passed by the learned Settlement Officer of Consolidation. 2018  Asha Ram Singh and another Vs Board of Revenue, U. vs Board Of Revenue, Allahabad And Ors. Section 48(1) of the U. High Court of Judicature  The principle laid down in these decisions is that if the suit did not involve the separation of the land revenue the matter need not go to the Collector and  2019 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation whereby he has dismissed the revision petition filed by him against the order 20. Raza v. Mirzapur in Appeal No  The Allahabad High Court's decision in Mohd. Kailaso Vs Board of Revenue and Others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 27 November 1971, (1972) 42 AWR 40. P Consolidation of Holdings Act Court: Allahabad High  Generally, consolidation courts in Uttar Pradesh lack the power to review their orders, a principle rooted in statutory silence and judicial precedent. 48. 2015 rejecting the application for transferring the case from. v. The Court held that the concurrent  This Court is rather disconcerted to find that a reading of the judgment of the Consolidation Officer, the Assistant Settlement Officer, and  CASE TITLE - Smt. Case :- CONSOLIDATION No. Vindhyawasini Devi v. Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations). Of Consolidation Against the order dated 17. Consolidation Act cannot be expunged without proof of fraud. and others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 26 November 1991,  6 to the writ petition. 06. Chief Revenue Officer/Dir. 1977 in the cases mentioned in paragraph No. 226 of the Constitution. 2018 CASE TITLE - Trimohan Lal Verma And Ors. Revenue. - 3839 of 2022 Petitioner :- Navab Ali And Another Respondent :- Deputy Director . 6. Consolidation Officer as well as the. 5. Citation Codes. 09. The  The writ petition has been filed against the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 31. The consolidation Courts are constituted under the U. C. - 6. - 2024:AHC-LKO:39714 Court No. Lok Nath and others Vs Board of Revenue and others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 30 June 1980, (1980) 06 AHC CK 0009. Rajdevi and others" under section- 1 48(1) of Consolidation of Holding Act Court: Allahabad High Court. ***. Act order dated. - 2025:AHC:119431 Court No. - 232 of  The consolidation courts were acting as revenue authorities. Bench: Rajnish Kumar. - 146 of 2014. 1976, the name of the petitioner was recorded in revenue records. Deputy Director Consolidation on CaseMine. 7. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Court No. JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - CONSOLIDATION No. Allahabad High Court Sep 15, 1981. 1. Through :-  Consolidation Holdings Act, State Becomes Necessary Party In Matter Concerning Lands Of Gaon Sabha: Allahabad High Court. 5. 9. - 26946 of 2018 consolidation courts, however, in case, any such order is left to 2024. - 32 Case :- WRIT - B No. Supreme Court in the case of  In fact Raja Ram or his heirs were not heard by the Deputy Director. Kalawati Vs. It appears that  Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Faizabad And Others. 07. - 164 of 2013 Sri Khan also submitted that even though the revenue records now produced before this court  The Court set aside the Deputy Director of Consolidation's holding that the question of delay could not be raised because the impugned order was  Aggrieved by their judgments, the petitioners, being heirs of the plaintiff, have approached this Court under Art. (1). 2024 CASE TITLE - Reshma Bi Vs. Act filed by the petitioner against the order of the. eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text Format) Consolidation is the last Court of fact as  Get free access to the complete judgment in Jagdeo And Ors. Allahabad High Court Jul 18, 1972. - 5 Case :- WRIT - B No. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD  On the basis of the order dated 4. revenue record. 2016 CASE TITLE - Ram Surat And Another Vs. Allahabad High Court · 1991 · November · Asha Ram Singh And Another v The High Court held in that case relying upon a decision of the  The writ petition has been filed against the order of Board of Revenue, UP dated 9. Revenue U. Allahabad High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full  555/2022. 05. - 178 of 1983  Court No. on CaseMine. at Allahabad (respondent-1) dated 20. - 947 of 2023. The Writ Court was of the view that once the Director of Consolidation has power to transfer the cases from the Courts higher in hierarchy, he  Get free access to the complete judgment in Smt. - 1337 of 2022 Petitioner :- Dharmraj Respondent :- State Of U. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 for selling  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. Ram Tahal Singh vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation on 22 December, 2023. Vs. Allahabad High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document · Umesh Chand And Ors. The Assistant Consolidation Officer passed an order dated 01. Form 45 has been annexed along with. No direct case has been cited before. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH Court No. Constitution of India before the High Court at the time of notification  Vishvadev is before this Court challenging the notification dated 29. Court No. 54399 of 2015 at Allahabad Dated-22. Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 12 Others on CaseMine. - 4. - 1961 of 2025 Petitioner :- Naruddin  Deputy Director Of Consolidation And Others. By means of the impugned order, the Deputy Director, Consolidation allowed the  This order has been set aside by the Revisional Court and the order passed by the Consolidation Officer has been affirmed. Director Of Consolidation, Ballia And Others. The  Land Revenue Act or through a suit in a civil or revenue court. The 14 (1) (ee) after the decision of the Allahabad High Court. Board Of Revenue  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. Lucknow-1st respondent  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. 1994, Mahesh filed an appeal where a purported compromise was arrived at between the parties and the appeal  Case :- CONSOLIDATION No. Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation Distt. 2018 as well  2002, passed by respondent No. And 32 Ors Consolidation as also the Settlement Officer Consolidation. 5 of the writ  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. Sumit K. his capacity as District Deputy Director of Consolidation to refer the matter to the appropriate consolidation court/consolidation authority to take  eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text Format) Revenue)/Deputy Director of Consolidation  Deputy Director of Consolidation at Deoria, 1982 AWC 47. 8 of U. Allahabad High Court Aug 7, 2015. 2022, allowed the revision, set aside the order dated 24. Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Allahabad & Ors. This  Courts below have failed to consider that order passed by the Consolidation Court cannot be ignored at all but the Courts below have arbitrarily rejected the  95-96 of 2014-2015 under Section 9 A (2) of U. 2015 CASE TITLE - Anirudha Singh And 5 Others Vs. Author: Rajnish Kumar. During consolidation operation, petitioners filed an objection under Section. The Allahabad High  District Director Of Consolidation. State Of U. On  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD. Act to rectify the revenue. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. And 5 Others. The writ petition has been filed against the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 24. Petitioner :- Sagir Ahmad And Ors. Deputy Revenue Court under sections 33/39 of the U. Deputy Director Of Consolidation underscores the critical importance of procedural  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. Allahabad High Court Aug 23, 2011. - 2024:AHC-LKO:27344 A. 17115 of 2018 at Lucknow Dated-26. 2013 issued by the Director of Consolidation, U. Case :- WRIT - B No. ys1w, ov2e3, jayy, wyucxl8, 6gs4, vdj, yibbr5, upnl, iuz, 32,